Davis v. Fudge et al
| Willie Gaster Davis, Jr |
| Madie Fudge and David White |
| 5:2009cv00318 |
| October 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Brian S. Miller |
| H. David Young |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER finding as moot 16 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 18 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/3/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim; this dismissal counts as a "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/16/09. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that pltf's complt be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted 2 . This dismissal count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 USC 1915(g). The Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Objections to R&R due no later than eleven days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 10/27/2009. (lej)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
