Collins et al v. Norris
| Kingrale Collins and Brandon Lacy |
| Larry Norris |
| 5:2009cv00340 |
| November 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| James M. Moody |
| H. David Young |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT re 8 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations; this case is dismissed without prejudice; the relief sought is denied; the Court further certifies that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/23/09. (mkf)
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that pltf Brandon Lacy's motion to be dismissed as a party be granted, Lacy's claims be dismissed without prejudice, and Lacy's name be removed as a party pltf 5 . Pltf Kingrale Collins' complt be dism issed without prejudice for failure to pay the $350 filing fee, failure to comply with LR 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's order 2 . The Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Objections to R&R due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 12/9/2009. (lej)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
