Goodrum v. Robinson et al
Christopher Wayne Goodrum, Sr |
Gerald Robinson, Ronnie Cole, Ed Adams and Christie Ford |
5:2009cv00343 |
November 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
Beth Deere |
Brian S. Miller |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 JUDGMENT re 70 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing the case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/19/11. (kpr) |
Filing 66 ORDER ADOPTING 42 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/15/11. (bkp) |
Filing 45 ORDER directing the plaintiff to submit a status report, including his current address, and a current request to proceed ifp to the Court within 30 days of this Order; and directing the Clerk of Court to send to plaintiff an application to proceed ifp, along with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/21/10. (bkp) |
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING 7 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's claims regarding the loss of his dentures and the conditions of his confinement without prejudice; and dismissing defts Gerald Robinson and Ronnie Cole as party defendants. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/20/10. (bkp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.