Jones v. Hobbs
| Jack Harold Jones |
| Ray Hobbs |
| Don W Davis |
| 5:2010cv00065 |
| March 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Vacate 54 Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/26/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 42 Motion to Intervene of Jason Harold McGehee; granting 47 Motion to Intervene of Bruce Ward ; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. To permit an appeal of this Order, Davis and Johnsons requests for stays of execution are GRANTED pending further orders from this Court. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/5/10. (dac)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting 20 Motion of Don W Davis to Intervene. Davis is directed to file a complaint on or before March 19, 2010. Responses to 9 Motion to Dismiss must be filed on or before 3/26/10 and the reply no later than 4/2/10. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/17/10. (dac)
|
|
Filing
12
OPINION AND ORDER that Jones's 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED; STAYING THE EXECUTION of Jack Harold Jones, Jr. pending further Orders from this Court. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/11/10. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
