Coleman v. Hobbs
Plaintiff: Robert Coleman
Defendant: Ray Hobbs
Case Number: 5:2010cv00248
Filed: August 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Jerome T. Kearney
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 JUDGMENT re 10 Order dismissing petitioner's habeas petition with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/12/12. (kpr)
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER informing petitioner of his opportunity to reply within 30 days to the 6 Response to Habeas Petition filed by Ray Hobbs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 3/15/11. (kpr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Hobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Hobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?