Staley v. May et al
||Albert J Staley
||Larry D May, Suzanne Hixson, Harold Erwine and Debbie Wise
||August 23, 2010
||Arkansas Eastern District Court
||Pine Bluff Office
||J. Leon Holmes
||Jerome T. Kearney
|Nature of Suit:
||Prison Condition: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 28, 2011
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 45 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; this action is hereby STAYED pending disposition of State of Arkansas v. Albert J. Staley, in the Circuit Court of Randolph County, Arkansas, No. CV-2009-172; the Clerk is directed to terminate this action administratively. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/28/11. (vjt)
|September 22, 2011
ORDER re 36 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Larry D May. The motion to dismiss will be construed as a motion for summary judgment and the parties shall have 10 days from the date of this Order in which to present any additional material pertinent to such motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/22/11. (kpr)
|August 4, 2011
ORDER adopting 29 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, defts Hixson, Erwin, and Wise are dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/4/11. (vjt)
|October 18, 2010
JUDGMENT pursuant to 11 Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to state a claim; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/18/10. (vjt)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?