Proctor v. Hobbs et al
| Terrance Proctor |
| Ray Hobbs, Grant Harris, Sheila Sharp, Darryl Golden, Jeffery Jerry, Mike Brockman, Barbara Smallwood, James Gibson, Wendy Kelly, Larry May, James Banks and Does |
| 5:2010cv00317 |
| November 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| James M. Moody |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
JUDGMENT re 59 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations dismissing the case and certifying that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/5/11. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER adopting 44 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction 28 , for an order to show cause 31 , and to compel 32 are DENIED. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/9/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing the U.S. Marshal to serve summons, complaint 1 , and this Order on defts without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 1/4/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
4
JUDGMENT re 3 Order dismissing complaint without prejudice and certifying that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/4/10. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
