Brown v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| Daniel Ray Brown |
| Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Roger Cameron, Ron Chism, Obadiah Davis, Shantrice Shavers, Arkansas Department of Community Correction, Kent Villines, James L Williams, David Eberhard, Arkansas Board of Pardons & Paroles and John Felts |
| 5:2010cv00326 |
| November 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Beth Deere |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 86 Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, this case is dismissed with prejudice and the relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/5/2014. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
86
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The Court determines that neither Mr. Chism nor Ms. Johnson were deliberately indifferent to Mr. Brown's needs, therefore the Court declines to award to Mr. Brown compensatory damages. The Court does not reach the issue of punitive damages. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/28/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER ADOPTING 44 Partial Report and Recommendations and granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defts. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Hobbs, Cameron, Davis, Shavers, and Eberhard are dismissed without prejudice based on no exhaustion. Brown may proceed on his deliberate-indiferrence claims against Chism and Johnson, but only in their individual capacities. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/17/11. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Partial Recommended Disposition. Brown's claims against the Arkansas Department of Correction, the Arkansas Department of Community Correction, the Arkansas Board of Pardons and Parole, and John Felts are dismissed with prejudice. Brown's claims against Villines and Williams are dismissed without prejudice. To the extent his complaint (as supplemented) alleges a race-discrimination claim and a breach-of-confidentiality claim, those claims are also dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/19/11. (hph)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
