Boyle v. Lay et al
Shannon Boyle |
Merlin Fitzpatrick, Gaylon Lay, Vernon Robertson and DeAngelo Earl |
5:2011cv00014 |
January 26, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
James M. Moody |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 ORDER ADOPTING 66 Partial Report and Recommendations granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defts Lay and Robertson are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may proceed with his excessive force claim against defts Earl and Fitzpatrick in their individual capacities only. The Court certifies an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/6/12. (kpr) |
Filing 34 ORDER granting, as specified herein, docket entry # 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 07/15/2011. (ksm) |
Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING 3 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing plaintiff's 14th Amendment claims without prejudice. Plaintiff may proceed with his Eighth Amendment claims against defts. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for deft s Lay, Robertson, Earl and Fitzpatrick, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint and this order on them without prepayment of fees therefor. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/18/11. (bkp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.