Kelley v. Anderson et al
| James Kelley |
| Wendy Kelley, Jacqueline Carswell, Charlotte Green, Sandra Thomas, Correctional Medical Services, Straughn and Anderson |
| 5:2011cv00130 |
| May 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 96 Order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case with prejudice with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant William Straughn, and without prejudice in all other respects; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/13/2012. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER ADOPTING 69 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, 62 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Charlotte Green, Roland Anderson, Corizon Inc, Jacqueline Carswell, and Sandra Thomas, is GRANTED; pltf's claims against them are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Corizon Inc, Charlotte Green, Sandra Thomas, Roland Anderson and Jacqueline Carswell terminated. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/24/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying pltf's Motions 43 to Appoint Counsel and 44 for Medical Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 9/22/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
