Caradine/Assabur v. Conrad

Caradine/Assabur v. Conrad

Plaintiff:	William F Caradine/Assabur
Defendant:	Conrad
Case Number:	5:2011cv00205
Filed:	August 8, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Pine Bluff Office
County:	Lincoln
Presiding Judge:	Brian S. Miller
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 7, 2011	Filing 7 JUDGMENT : Consistent with the order entered today, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice, and the relief sought is denied. It is further certified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this judgment and the accompanying order of dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/7/11. (hph)
August 25, 2011	Filing 4 ORDER denying 1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; dismissing this case without prejudice pursuant to the 3 strikes rule in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to continue this case, he must, within 30 days of the entry of this order of dismissal: (a) pay the $350 filing fee in full, noting the above case style and number; and (b) file a motion to reopen the case. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order of dismissal and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/25/11. (hph)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 7, 2011

Filing 7 JUDGMENT : Consistent with the order entered today, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice, and the relief sought is denied. It is further certified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this judgment and the accompanying order of dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/7/11. (hph)

August 25, 2011

Filing 4 ORDER denying 1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; dismissing this case without prejudice pursuant to the 3 strikes rule in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to continue this case, he must, within 30 days of the entry of this order of dismissal: (a) pay the $350 filing fee in full, noting the above case style and number; and (b) file a motion to reopen the case. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order of dismissal and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/25/11. (hph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caradine/Assabur v. Conrad
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: William F Caradine/Assabur
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Conrad
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?