Scott v. Coleman et al
| Willie Scott, Jr |
| Jimmy Coleman, IV, C Rayner and A Weekly |
| 5:2011cv00269 |
| October 13, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 51 Memorandum & Order that was entered on this day, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/24/2013. (srw)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying without prejudice 32 Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery; and denying without prejudice 32 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/8/2013. (srw)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER finding service is appropriate for Defendant Weekly; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for the Defendant; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of 6 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and summons on this Defendant without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/7/2013. (srw)
|
|
Filing
13
JUDGMENT re 12 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/17/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
