Bradford v. Hobbs
Roger Bradford |
Ray Hobbs |
5:2012cv00077 |
February 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lee |
Jerome T. Kearney |
James M. Moody |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 JUDGMENT: In accordance with the 35 Court's Order entered in this case on this date, IT IS CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that the 1 petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/16/2012. (dmn) |
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING 10 Partial Report and Recommendations and denying 5 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/8/12. (kpr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bradford v. Hobbs | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roger Bradford | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ray Hobbs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.