McCarty v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Arkansas Inc et al
| Mike McCarty |
| Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Arkansas Inc |
| 5:2012cv00148 |
| April 25, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Out of State |
| James M. Moody |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
JUDGMENT on Plaintiff's breach-of-contract claim is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff. It is ordered that Plaintiff Mike McCarty recover from Defendant Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company the amount of $47,059.32 on the breach-of-contract claim. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/10/2013. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
102
LETTER ORDER re location of the trial. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/24/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting deft's 33 Motion to Dismiss; pltf's claims for the tort of bad faith and declaratory relief and pltf's requests for attorney's fees and punitive damages are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/15/13. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 15 Motion for Declaratory Judgment without prejudice; and denying 25 Motion for Hearing without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 12/3/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
