Earls v. Pitts et al
| Jacob Thomas Earls |
| Allen Cheeks, Glynn Pitts, Colton Shadwick, Milton Peebles and Robbie Fread |
| 5:2012cv00235 |
| June 29, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Arkansas |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
JUDGMENT re 23 Order granting plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/22/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER re 17 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Colton Shadwick, Glynn Pitts. Plaintiff is directed to file a response and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts. Plaintiff shall also file an updated ifp application within 15 days of the date of this Order. The Clerk shall forward to plaintiff an ifp application. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/16/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing Earls's claims against defts Fread, Peebles, and Cheeks, without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/7/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons for defts Pitts and Shadwick. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and summons on these defts without prepayment of costs therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/15/12. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
