Richardson v. Kelley et al
| Every Donelle Richardson |
| Cynthia Newton, Jennifer McBride, Wendy Kelley and Connie Hubbard |
| 5:2012cv00250 |
| July 11, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Brian S. Miller |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER denying 73 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/24/2013. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER denying 38 Plaintiff's Third Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting 39 Defendants' Motion to Compel. The Plaintiff must sign, date, and return the "Authorization to Disclose Health Information" form to Defendants on or before 9/11/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 08/30/2013. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 6 the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition; allowing Plaintiff Every Donelle Richardson to proceed with his inadequate medical care claims against defendants Wendy Kelley, Jennifer McBride, Connie Hubbard and Cynthia Newton and ordering service on those four defendants; and dismissing, without prejudice, Richardson's due process claim against Kelley and McBride for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/30/2012. (kdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
