Elmore v. Kelly et al
| Jeffery Charles Elmore |
| Wendy Kelly, Jennifer McBride, A McClean, Genia Snyder, Connie Hubbard, Jacquelen Carswell, Ojivgo Iko, Sharon Cantrell, Hoot Gibson, James Banks, Curtis Meinzer and Lena Baum |
| 5:2012cv00325 |
| August 20, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Beth Deere |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
JUDGMENT re 120 Order dismissing all claims. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/14/14. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING 85 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, pltf's 81 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/26/13. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 73 Motion to Compel; denying 74 Motion for Copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 2/21/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER ADOPTING 52 Partial Report and Recommendations and denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/8/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER adopting 5 Partial Recommended Disposition and dismissing without prejudice claims against Defendants Watt, Burchfield,Jones, Malone, Price, Anderson, Correctional Medical Services, and Pharmacorr Pharmacy. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/18/2012. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
