Robinson v. Mine Safety Appliances Company et al
| Hershel Lee Robinson |
| Vulcan Materials Company, Does, 3M Company, Pangborn Corporation, Clark Sand Company Inc, Dependable Abrasives Inc, Precision Packaging Inc, Morie Company, Pine Bluff Sand and Gravel Company, E D Bullard Company, Empire Abrasive Equipment Corporation, Empire Abrasive Equipment Company LP, Clemco Industries Inc, Schmidt Manufacturing Inc, Bob Schmidt Inc, Pauli & Griffin Company, Kelco Sales & Engineering Company, Mississippi Valley Silica Co Inc, Standard Sand & Silica Company, Unimin Corporation, Doe Corporation, American Optical Corporation and Mine Safety Appliances Company |
| 5:2012cv00383 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Out of State |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
379
JUDGMENT dismissing this case. Robinson's claims against Dependable Abrasives, Inc., Standard Sand & Silica Co., Vulcan Materials Co., Empire Abrasive Equipment Co. L.P., Schmidt Manufacturing Inc., Bob Schmidt Inc., Pauli & Griffin Co., Kelc o Sales & Engineering Co., Mississippi Valley Silica Co. Inc., Unimin Corp., Morie Co., Pine Bluff Sand and Gravel Co., Empire Abrasive Equipment Corp., 3M Co., and all Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. All cross claims by and against t hose parties are dismissed without prejudice too. Robinson's claims against Clark Sand Co. Inc. and American Optical Corp. are dismissed with prejudice. All cross claims by and against Clark Sand Co. Inc. and American Optical Corp. are dismisse d without prejudice. Robinson's complaint against Mine Safety Appliances Co., Pangborn Corp., Precision Packaging Inc., E. D. Bullard Co., and Clemco Industries Inc. is dismissed with prejudice. All cross claims by and against these parties are dismissed without prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/28/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
344
ORDER denying 337 Motion to Stay the Summary Judgment briefing. Robinson's responses due by 20 March 2014. Any replies due by 31 March 2014. The disclosure issues should be explored at Dr. Ridgeway's upcoming deposition. Defendants may then file a separate motion for sanctions if they choose to do so. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/18/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
312
ORDER granting 307 opposed motion to continue. An Amended Final Scheduling Order will issue. The 306 motion to strike Robinson's belated discovery is denied as moot. The Court would appreciate a complete condensed transcript of any deposition cited as an exhibit in any filed paper. Supplemental filings due by 3/3/2014. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/26/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
290
ORDER granting 279 motion; supplementing 198 Order entered 8/19/2013; and dismissing 258 all of Robinson's claims and all cross claims against all the Doe Defendants without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/07/2014.
|
|
Filing
259
ORDER granting 257 unopposed motion to dismiss and dismissing without prejudice all of Robinson's claims and all cross claims against Empire Abrasive Equipment Corporation. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/29/2014. (thd)
|
|
Filing
241
ORDER granting 239 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's claims against Unimin Corporation, The Morie Company, Inc., and Pine Bluff Sand and Gravel, without prejudice. All cross claims against these three parties are dismissed without prejudice, too. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/20/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
216
ORDER granting 215 Motion to Dismiss Party. All of plaintiff's claims and cross claims against Mississippi Valley Silica Company are dismissed without prejudice. The 208 Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/30/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
198
ORDER granting 195 Motion to Dismiss Parties and dismissing all claims against Empire Abrasive Equipment Co. L.P., Schmidt Manufacturing Inc., Bob Schmidt Inc., Pauli & Griffin Co., and Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., without prejudice, and dismissing all these parties' cross claims without prejudice, too. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/19/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER granting 184 Motion to Dismiss Party. All claims and cross claims against Vulcan Materials are dismissed without prejudice. The 86 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney is granted, and Attorney Mark Clyde Burgess terminated. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/25/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER authorizing W. Mark Edwards, Matthew R. Dowd and Daniel J. Mulholland to bring certain electronics into the Courthouse on July 16, 2013, pursuant to the rules set forth in this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/15/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 153 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Status conference will be held in Little Rock on July 16, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Room B155 of the Richard Sheppard Arnold U.S. Courthouse. Counsel for all partie s must attend. Robinson's response to Clark's Sand's statement of undisputed material facts is stricken for noncompliance with the Court's Scheduling Order. The Amended Complaint is due by August 15, 2013. Robinson should wait until after the status conference before amending. Robinson's conforming statement is due by June 14th. clark Sand's reply is due by June 21st. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/6/13. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
