Friedman et al v. Farmer et al
Jerry Friedman and FM Service Equipment Group Inc |
Arkat Nutrition Inc, Kelly Farmer, John Does, Ainsworth Pet Nutrition Inc and John Farmer |
5:2013cv00027 |
January 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Out of State |
J. Leon Holmes |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 ORDER: Pursuant to the 94 Order ruling on the motions for summary judgment and the Order ruling on Ainsworth Pet Nutrition's motion to dismiss and the motion to dismiss the claims against Arkat Nutrition, Inc., all claims asserted by all parties in this action are dismissed. Ainsworth Pet Nutrition's cross-claims are dismissed without prejudice. All other claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/2/2014. (ks) |
Filing 94 ORDER granting Ainsworth's 63 Motion for Summary Judgment regarding plaintiffs' claims; granting Ainsworth's 64 Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Kelly Farmer, John Farmer, and Arkat Nutrition's crossclaim is granted. Joh n Farmer's 58 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Kelly Farmer's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Arkat Nutrition's 55 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The Plaintiffs' breach-of-contract and promissory-estoppel claims against Arkat Nutrition remain. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/19/2014. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.