Reid v. Kelly et al
Andrew Reid |
Wendy Kelly, Richard, Ray Hobbs and Rector |
5:2013cv00249 |
August 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
J. Leon Holmes |
Jerome T. Kearney |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 JUDGMENT pursuant to 91 Order, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/13/2015. (jak) |
Filing 77 ORDER adopting 71 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Summary Judgment and renewed requests for the appointment of an expert and preliminary injunctive relief are denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/20/2014. (jak) |
Filing 64 ORDER adopting 61 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, defendants' 58 motion to dismiss and for costs is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/19/2014. (ks) |
Filing 49 ORDER denying 43 44 Motions to Appoint Expert without prejudice and granting 46 Motion for a Ruling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 04/22/2014. (rhm) |
Filing 41 ORDER adopting in their entirety 39 proposed findings and recommendations and granting Richard's 20 motion to dismiss. Richard is dismissed with prejudice from plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/29/2014. (ks) |
Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING 28 Partial Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 22 Motion for Order are DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/2/13. (vjt) |
Filing 31 ORDER re 29 Response filed by Wendy Kelly, Ray Hobbs directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for the Defendant Dr. Margaret Peggy Rector, in care of ADC, 7300 Dollarway Road, Suite 101, Pine Bluff, AR 71612-0550, and the U S Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the summons and complaint without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/15/2013. (rhm) |
Filing 27 ORDER re 24 Summons Returned Unexecuted. The defendants are directed to provide to the Court, under seal, the last-known address of defendant Rector within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/7/13. (kpr) |
Filing 23 ORDER re 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and 22 MOTION for Order filed by Andrew Reid. Defendants shall respond within ten days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 10/22/13. (kpr) |
Filing 14 ORDER. The 7 Order directing the issuance of summons and service on defts inadvertently omitted deft Dr. Rector. Service is appropriate for deft Dr. Rector. The Clerk is directed to prepare summons and the U.S. Marshal is to serve a copy of the summons and the complaint on deft Rector in care of Humphries Odum and Eubanks, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 10/1/13. (kpr) |
Filing 11 ORDER re 9 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Andrew Reid. The Clerk is directed to serve deft Dr. Richard in care of Humphries, Odum & Eubanks, P.O. Box 20670, White Hall, AR 71612, without prepayment of fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/6/13. (kpr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.