Barker v. Barnes et al
| Larry E Barker |
| Barnes, White, J Jones, Sevoit and Boettger |
| 5:2014cv00181 |
| May 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Hot Spring |
| James M. Moody |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING 35 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Renew is DENIED; Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Proceed contains the same arguments as those addressed in the Recommended Disposition and is DENIED for the same reasons. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and his claims against the remaining Defendants Barnes, White and Savoy are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/23/2015. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Jones and Boettger are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may pro ceed with his inadequate medical care claims against Defendants Barnes, Sevoit, and White. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Defendants Barnes, Sevoit, and White. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, and this Order on them through the ADC Compliance Division without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/28/2014. (ks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
