Bannister v. Hobbs

Plaintiff: Robert E Bannister
Defendant: Ray Hobbs
Case Number: 5:2014cv00201
Filed: May 21, 2014
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Izard
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Referring Judge: J. Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 19, 2015 14 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT dismissing Bannister's 2 petition with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/19/2015. (ks)
July 11, 2014 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing the Petitioner to file, on or before 8/11/2014, a Reply addressing the arguments for dismissal raised in the Response 8 . Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 07/11/2014. (kcs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bannister v. Hobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert E Bannister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Hobbs
Represented By: Christian Scholfield Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?