Harrell v. Robinson et al
| David Harrell |
| Gerald Robinson, Lafayette Woods and Stanley James |
| 5:2014cv00214 |
| June 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
JUDGMENT against David Harrell and for the City of Hot Springs, for Jefferson County, for sheriff Gerald Robinson, for deputy Lafayette Woods, and for Deputy Stanley James. Harrell's amended complaint, 20 , is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/25/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER: The Court inadvertently failed to dismiss Harrell's echoing Arkansas Civil Rights Act race claim when it dismissed his 1983 race claims, 90 . By agreement, the ACRA claim is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/24/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER: On Harrell's unopposed motion, his 1983 claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/11/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: The Court has tried its best, but the current motion papers in this employment case are too tangled to unravel. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, 32 , is denied without prejudice. The motion to incorporate, 31 , is denied as moot. The Defendants may file a new dispositive motion by 13 November 2015. Please follow the Court's motion protocol. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/7/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER: The summary-judgment papers are a bit tangled on the limitations issues. The Court would appreciate help on these points. Did Harrell get a right-to-sue letter on his February 2010 EEOC charge? If so, when? On the July 2012 charge: is there any precedent on a premature suit ripening into effectiveness after a right-to-sue letter is received? Simultaneous supplemental filings due on 18 September 2015. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/9/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk to reinstate the remaining defendants' motion for summary judgment, 32 , and motion to adopt Hot Springs' arguments on summary judgment, 31 , which do not appear to have been ruled on before the transfer. An Amended Final Scheduling Order will issue. The Court will set a trial date and provide new deadlines for updated pre-trial disclosures, motions in limine, and jury instructions. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/19/2015. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
