Hanley v. Vilches et al
| David Antoine Hanley |
| Brad Vilches and Gordon |
| 5:2014cv00228 |
| June 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT: Hanley's claims against the Pine Bluff Police Department are dismissed with prejudice. Hanley's claims against Gordon and Vilches are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/23/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER directing Hanley to update his address with the Clerk of Court by 20 November 2015. If he doesn't, then his complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Hanley at the Randall L. Williams Correctional Facility, 7206 West 7th Avenue, Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/21/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER dismissing without prejudice Hanley's claims against Gordon for failure to serve process. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/2/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER: Status reports due by 1 June 2015. Unless Hanley provides proof of service or shows good cause, the Court will dismiss the claims against Gordon without prejudice for failure to serve process. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/22/2015. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
