Deshazer v. Arkansas, State of
Plaintiff: Kendra Katrise Deshazer
Defendant: Arkansas, State of
Case Number: 5:2014cv00295
Filed: August 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: Kristine G. Baker
Presiding Judge: Jerome T. Kearney
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 23 Order entered in this matter on this date, the Court dismisses with prejudice this action. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because plaintiff has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/24/2015. (rhm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deshazer v. Arkansas, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendra Katrise Deshazer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arkansas, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?