Daniels v. Kelly et al
| Cody Daniels |
| Wendy Kelly, Connie Hubbard, Burnett and Does |
| 5:2014cv00360 |
| September 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Brian S. Miller |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER ADOPTING 97 the recommended disposition; granting 83 defendants' motion for summary judgment; and dismissing with prejudice plaintiff Codie Daniels's inadequate medical care claim. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/28/2016. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 72 granting in part and denying in part defts' 45 Motion for Summary Judgment; Daniels may proceed with his delay in surgery claim against Burnett and Hubbard, and with his post-surgical medication s claim against Hubbard; all other claims and defts are dismissed without prejudice; the case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Ray to set remaining discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/17/15. (tjb)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER directing Defendant Burnett to file an Answer or other responsive pleading on or before 4/15/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 03/30/2015. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
3
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/30/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
