Bargo et al v. Hobbs et al
| Jerome Allen Bargo, Marion Gene Westerman and Robert Harold Munnerlyn |
| Ray Hobbs, Randall Watson, Jeremy Andrews, Raymond Naylor, Thomas Roland, Keith Waddle, Gladys Evans, Jimmy Phillips and Ojiugo Iko |
| 5:2014cv00393 |
| October 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 127 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that this case be and it is hereby, dismissed with prejudice. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/27/2017. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 7 24 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND PARTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; denying as moot 2 co-plaintiff Westerman's motion to proceed ifp and dismissing him as a plaintiff in this action; denying 3 co-plaintiff Munnerlyn's motion to proceed ifp and dismissing him as a plaintiff in this action; dismissing defendants Hobbs, Watson, Naylor, Roland, Evans, and Iko as defendants in this action; dismissing plaintiff Bargo's voice stress analysis claims without prejudice; and dismissing plaintiff Bargo's cruel and unusual punishment and deliberate indifference claims without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 04/08/2015. (rhm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
