Harris v. Ford et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 13, 2016
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 57 Recommended Partial Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and granting in part and denying in part defendant Tommy Stringfellow's 36 motion for summary judgment. Plain tiff Ivie Harris, Jr., may proceed with his claims alleging that Mr. Stringfellow, in his individual capacity only: (a) used or authorized the use of excessive force against Mr. Harris; and (b) denied Mr. Harris adequate medical care for the injuries he claims to have sustained during the use of force. All other claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/13/2016. (ljb)
|April 27, 2015
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety in all respects 6 Recommended Partial Disposition. Plaintiff may proceed with his conditions of confinement, inadequate medical care, excessive force, and retaliation claims against defendant Tommy Strin gfellow. All other claims and defendants are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Mr. Stringfellow, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, amended complaint, and this Order on him without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/27/2015. (ljb)
|December 31, 2014
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/31/2014. (kcs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?