Martin v. Lay et al
| Edwin Martin |
| G Lay, J Buyers, Wendy Kelly and Dana Payton |
| 5:2015cv00076 |
| March 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| D. P. Marshall |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
JUDGMENT: Martin's claims against Lay and Kelley are dismissed without prejudice. Martin's claims against Byers raised in grievance CU-14-1867 is dismissed with prejudice. Martin's other claims against Byers are dismissed without preju dice. Martin's claims against Peyton raised in grievance CU-14- 2147 - and limited to the period from 9/23/2014 to 10/8/2014-are dismissed with prejudice. Martin's other claims against Peyton are dismissed without prejudice. Martin's claims against Chance and Wilson are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/4/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 56 MOTION to Withdraw his Amended Complaint, 53 . All claims against Chance and Wilson are dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order will not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/30/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
3
INITIAL ORDER for pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 03/10/2015. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
