Wiggins v. Knott et al
Devan Wiggins |
David D Knott, Greg Moore, Sonya Anissa Peppers-Davis, Michael M Lowe, Stephen Williams, Marvin Evans, Jr and Raymond Naylor |
5:2015cv00190 |
June 10, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
D. P. Marshall |
Joe J. Volpe |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 JUDGMENT: Wiggins's claims against Defendants Lowe, Williams, Evans, and Naylor are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Wiggins's claims against Defendant Peppers-Davis are dismissed without prejudice as improperly jo ined. Wiggins's official-capacity claims against Defendants Knott and Moore are dismissed with prejudice. Wiggins's individual-capacity claims against Defendants Knott and Moore are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/6/2015. (jak) |
Filing 37 ORDER adopting 29 Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Wiggins's official-capacity claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/26/2015. (ks) |
Filing 28 ORDER adopting unopposed recommendation, 22 . Motion for preliminary injunction, 16 , denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/10/2015. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.