Pitts v. Kelley
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 23, 2018
ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case effective 9/21/2017 - the date the Court adopted Magistrate Judge Kearney's stay recommendation. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/23/2018. (jak)
|September 21, 2017
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion. The 5/16/2017 Order is adopted as supplemented. Kelley's 26 Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice. The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Kearney did not clearly err or misapply the law in granting a stay. It will remain in place. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/21/2017. (jak)
|August 18, 2017
ORDER granting 52 and 54 Motion and supplemental motion to withdraw. John Wesley Hall is relieved as counsel in this case. Pitts's 53 Motion to proceed pro se is granted. His embedded motion or more time to file a pro se response is also granted. Any pro se response to Kelley's pending motion to lift the stay is due by 9/18/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/18/2017. (jak)
|December 23, 2015
ORDER adopting as modified 4 Recommendation. The Court directs the Clerk to correct the docket: No. 6 is a supplement to the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, not a new motion. Petition, motion to stay, and motion to proceed in forma pauperis (as supplemented), 1 , 2 , 3 , & 4 , transferred to the Court of Appeals. The Court directs the Clerk to take all necessary steps to accomplish the transfer. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/23/2015. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?