Pitts v. Kelley
| Eugene Issac Pitts |
| Wendy Kelley |
| 5:2015cv00354 |
| November 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 89 Motion. The Court directs the Arkansas State Registrar of Vital Records and the Arkansas Department of Health to produce to Jeremey B. Lowrey a certified copy of Eugene Issac Pitts's death certificate. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/7/2022. (jak)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER denying as moot 82 motion to correct or clarify the record. The Court stands by its conclusions in the final Order and Judgment, Doc. 75 , & 76 . The motion to amend, Doc. 77 , is denied. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/28/2022. (jak)
|
|
Filing
76
JUDGMENT: Pitts's petition is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/16/2021. (jak)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER directing the Clerk to administratively terminate this case effective 9/21/2017 - the date the Court adopted Magistrate Judge Kearney's stay recommendation. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/23/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion. The 5/16/2017 Order is adopted as supplemented. Kelley's 26 Motion to Dismiss is denied without prejudice. The Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Kearney did not clearly err or misapply the law in granting a stay. It will remain in place. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/21/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 52 and 54 Motion and supplemental motion to withdraw. John Wesley Hall is relieved as counsel in this case. Pitts's 53 Motion to proceed pro se is granted. His embedded motion or more time to file a pro se response is also granted. Any pro se response to Kelley's pending motion to lift the stay is due by 9/18/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/18/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting as modified 4 Recommendation. The Court directs the Clerk to correct the docket: No. 6 is a supplement to the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, not a new motion. Petition, motion to stay, and motion to proceed in forma pauperis (as supplemented), 1 , 2 , 3 , & 4 , transferred to the Court of Appeals. The Court directs the Clerk to take all necessary steps to accomplish the transfer. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/23/2015. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pitts v. Kelley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugene Issac Pitts | |
| Represented By: | John Wesley Hall, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wendy Kelley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
