Smith v. Crete Carrier Corporation et al
| Jimmy G Smith |
| Crete Carrier Corporation and Curtis Peavy |
| 5:2016cv00002 |
| January 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Chicot |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT: The Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/9/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: 47 Joint Report noted and appreciated. The 17 Amended Final Scheduling Order is suspended; the May 8 trial is canceled; and this case is stayed and administratively terminated. Joint status report due by 5/5/2017. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/24/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion. 37 Motion granted with a clarification. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/13/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
27
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/14/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Judgment on the pleadings. The claims against Crete are dismissed with prejudice. By 11/15/2016 the parties' motion for a protective order final version should be sent to chambers for signature and entry, or the parties should file a joint notice advising the Court that no such order is needed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/8/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
