Addison v. Straughn et al
| Nicholas Addison |
| Straughn, Cogsbill, Shelia Johny, Larry Norris, Harmen, D Stevens and Drake |
| 5:2016cv00004 |
| January 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Patricia S. Harris |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER Adopting 56 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Addison's 2 Complaint and 6 Amended Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/15/2016. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER adopting 51 partial recommendation. Unopposed 27 & 43 Motions for Summary Judgment granted. Addison's claims against Cogbill, Johnson, and Giggleman will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/22/2016. (jak)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 20 Motion to dismiss party. Addison's claims against William Straughn are dismissed without prejudice. Motion to substitute, 10 , granted. Wendy Kelley is the current Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction. The Court directs the Clerk to substitute Kelley for Larry Norris on the docket. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/19/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
