Ellis v. May et al
| Jerry J Ellis |
| Larry May, Wendy Kelley, Grant Harris, James Banks, Randy Watson, Mose Jackson, III, Curtis Meinzer, Floria Washington, James Plummer, Joseph Bivens, Darren Daniels, R Johnson, Carolyn Wallace, Demetria Henry, Marissa Bryant, Angelica Luckadue and Chamonz Jones |
| 5:2016cv00010 |
| January 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lonoke |
| James M. Moody |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 28 Order that was entered on this day, it considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/07/2016. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that if Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is deficient and some or all of his claims may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/13/2016. (lej)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
