Lemaster v. Kelley

Plaintiff: Roger Lemaster
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Case Number: 5:2016cv00035
Filed: February 5, 2016
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Out of State
Referring Judge: Jerome T. Kearney
Presiding Judge: Billy Roy Wilson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 2, 2016 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney; except for the ineffective assistance of counsel claim for failing to call Becky Lemaster as a witness during his case-in-chief, all claims in Mr. Lemaster's petition for writ of habeas corpus are dismissed 16 . Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/2/16. (tjb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lemaster v. Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Lemaster
Represented By: Walter Craig Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Represented By: Pamela Rumpz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?