Martin v. Steve et al
| Edwin Martin |
| Steve, Denise Chance, Royr Griffin and Powell |
| 5:2016cv00084 |
| March 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER adopting in their entirety the 46 proposed findings and recommendations; granting Jonathon Powell's 42 motion for summary judgment; and dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's claims against Jonathon Powell for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/9/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER adopting the 40 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; and granting in part and denying in part the 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Stieve and Powell. As to Defendant Stieve, the motion is deni ed in part. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Stieve were exhausted as to the time period of June 2015 through 1/9/2016. As to Defendant Powell, the motion is granted in part. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Powell are limited to his allegations of denial of pain medication on 8/6/2014, and from 8/24/2014 through 9/7/2014. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/30/2016. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
