Anderson v. Simpson et al
| Theodore Anderson |
| C Simpson, M Demery, Randy Watson and Marshall Reed |
| 5:2016cv00091 |
| March 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Beth Deere |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
JUDGMENT: Anderson's individual capacity claims against Simpson and Allen and his official capacity claims for damages are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/6/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 47 Defendant Demery's motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing without prejudice claims against him. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 12/28/2016. (mef)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 40 motion to amend; directing the Clerk of the Court to add "Jane Doe, the mail room lady" as a Defendant; and denying as premature 41 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 11/23/2016. (mef)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Deere's recommendation, 28 , and overruling Anderson's objections 29 & 30 . Motion for partial summary judgment, 11 , granted. Anderson's official-capacity claims for money damages are dismissed with prejudice. His remaining claims against Watson and Reed are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/12/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
