Ward v. Watson et al
| Terry Lee Ward |
| Randy Watson, Danny Burl and C Budnik |
| 5:2016cv00110 |
| April 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Patricia S. Harris |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
JUDGMENT: Ward's court access and retaliation claims against Burl are dismissed with prejudice. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/23/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER partly granting as modified and partly denying 134 Motion. Ward may have until 5/11/2018 to file his objections to the pending 133 recommendation. Ward's renewed motion for appointed counsel is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/10/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER Adopting 72 Partial Report and Recommendations. Burl's 28 Motion to Dismiss for insufficient service of process is denied. Ward's motion for an extension of time to object 77 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/28/2017. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER adopting the 18 Recommendation, and overruling Ward's objections 24 . Ward may proceed with his court access and retaliation claims against Defendant Burl. Ward's claims against all other Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/7/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
