Gipson v. McClung et al
| Curtis Gipson |
| McClung, Wendy Kelley, S Armstrong, Paula Cowell and Rory Griffin |
| 5:2016cv00211 |
| July 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Pulaski |
| Patricia S. Harris |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the 38 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting Curtis Gipson's 37 motion to voluntarily dismiss his complaint to the extent that his complaint is dismissed without prejudice; denying as moot defendants' 27 and 33 motions for summary judgment; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/21/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 8 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and dismissing without prejudice Gipson's claims against defendants Wendy Kelley, Paula Cowell, Toni Bradley, the Arkansas Board of Correction, and Does. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/21/2016. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
