Plessy v. Griffin et al
Quincy Jay Plessy |
Roy Griffin, Jeffrey Stieve, Jason Kelley, Estella Bland, Wendy Kelley and Randy Watson |
5:2016cv00276 |
September 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
James M. Moody |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 JUDGMENT: Consistent with 88 the Order entered separately today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/30/2017. (kdr) |
Filing 65 ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 45 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Griffin and denying as to Watson and Wendy Kelley; granting 38 Motion for Summary J udgment as to Dr. Stieve and denying as to Jason Kelley; denying Plessy's 45 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing without prejudice Plessy's claims against Griffin and Dr. Stieve. Plessy may proceed with his inhumane working condition claim against Watson, Wendy Kelley, Jason Kelley, and Bland. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/22/2017. (ljb) |
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING 17 Recommended Partial Disposition. Plessy's 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/1/2016. (mcz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.