Watts v. Administrative Office of the Courts et al
| Ruby J Watts |
| Administrative Office of the Courts, John Stewart, Andrea Lea and Does |
| 5:2016cv00302 |
| September 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| James M. Moody |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
JUDGMENT: At the close of Plaintiff's case in chief, the Court granted Defendants' motions for directed verdict on all claims. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, and Plaintiff' complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 06/16/2021. (llg)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER adopting 19 the Partial Recommended Disposition; and dismissing without prejudice Ms. Watts's claims against the AOC and Doe Defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/9/2018. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING 15 Partial Report and Recommendations. Director Garrity's 14 Motion to Dismiss is granted, and the claims against her are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/5/2017. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting 5 Ms. Watts's motion to amend and directing the Clerk's office to add Marty Garrity as a defendant in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 2/2/2017. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
