Tarkington v. Burl et al
| Johnny Tarkington |
| Danny Burl, Carl E Stout, Kirk J Sterling, John Spears, James Carlton and Wendy Kelley |
| 5:2016cv00324 |
| October 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Beth Deere |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER adopting 43 the recommended disposition; and granting 31 defendants' motion for summary judgment, and dismissing 2 the complaint, without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/6/2017. (kdr) Docket entry modified on 4/7/2017 to correct the file date). (jak)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER adopting the 17 partial recommended disposition; and granting in part the defendants' 13 motion to dismiss with respect to Tarkington's failure to protect claim against defendant Kirk Sterling, but denied in all other respects. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/19/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER adopting the 5 partial recommended disposition. Accordingly, Tarkington's claims against defendant Kirk Sterling for filing a false disciplinary report; defendant James Carton for not allowing video footage at his disciplinary hearing; and defendant Wendy Kelley for the failure-to-train and the failure-to-supervise are all dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/23/2016. (rhm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
