Linn v. Andrews et al
Kevin Linn |
Jeremy Andrews, Michael Bolden, Keith Waddle, Randy Watson, Raymond Naylor and Ray Hobbs |
5:2017cv00038 |
February 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Pulaski |
Patricia S. Harris |
James M. Moody |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 132 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 131 order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case with prejudice; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/22/2019. (ljb) |
Filing 104 ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 102 the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects ; dismissing as moot Linn's claims for injunctive relief; and denying 91 Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/27/2018. (kdr) |
Filing 42 ORDER approving and adopting the 33 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/8/2017. (mef) |
Filing 6 ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 4 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and dismissing with prejudice plaintiff Kevin Linn's claims for monetary damages against the defendants in their official capacities. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/28/2017. (ljb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.