Radford v. Brooks et al
| Tommy Radford |
| Vivian Brooks, Erica Johnson, Cindella Wooten, Whitmore, Cynthia Gaines, Charlotte Sanders and Jared Byers |
| 5:2017cv00116 |
| April 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
JUDGMENT: Based on 67 Order, this case is dismissed with prejudice - except for the claims specifically dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and the corresponding Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/7/2018. (cmn)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Adopting 42 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition, in all respects. The Clerk is to amend the docket to reflect the full and correct names of Defendants Shana Whitmore and Cyndella Wooten. ADC Defendants' 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Plaintiff's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Medical Defendants' 34 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted, and Plaintiff's claims against them are limited to the incidents raised in the 6 exhausted grievances. I certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 8/30/2017. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER approving and adopting the 30 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his claim of deliberate indifference regarding his blood pressure medication and monitoring against Defendants Brooks, Joh nson, Wooten, Whitmore, Sanders, Sail, and Mosely; dismissing without prejudice the excessive force claim against Defendant Sanders and his related medical care claim against Defendant Jack; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claims regard ing failure to treat mouth sores against Defendants Nunn, Montgomery, Burl, and Young; dismissing from this action without prejudice Defendants Gaines, Byers, Nunn, Montgomery, Burl, Young, and Jack; and certifying pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 8/4/2017. (mef)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER approving and adopting the 5 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition in their entirety; dismissing Defendant Griffin from this action without prejudice; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his claims against Defendants Brooks, Johnson, Wooten, Whitmore, Gaines, Sanders, and Byers; and certifying, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/17/2017. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
