Doering v. Kelley et al
| Alan Doering |
| Wendy Kelley, Griffen, Correct Care Solutions, Jason Kelley, Stuckey, Powell and Heather Allen |
| 5:2017cv00125 |
| April 28, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
JUDGMENT: Doering's chronic-care claim and his state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. All other claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/19/2018. (jak)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER partly adopting and partly declining the 50 Recommendation; partly sustaining the 51 Objection; and partly granting and partly denying the 43 Motion for partial summary judgment. Doering's chronic-care claim is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/9/2017. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER adopting 41 Partial Recommendation. Doering's 40 Motion for Injunctive Relief is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/11/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: The Court vacates No. 3 , grants Doering's 1 IFP motion, and returns this case to the Magistrate Judge to handle payment details and screening. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/6/2017. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
