USA v. Daifullah

USA v. Daifullah

Plaintiff:	USA
Defendant:	Abdulla Nagi Naser Daifullah
Case Number:	5:2018cv00163
Filed:	June 19, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Pine Bluff Office
County:	Desha
Presiding Judge:	James M. Moody
Nature of Suit:	Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 3, 2020	Filing 45 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 44 order entered this day, judgment is entered in favor of the United States on its complaint and against Abdulla Nagi Naser Daifullah. Defendant's citizenship is revoked pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a). The order ad mitting Defendant to citizenship is revoked and set aside, and the Certificate of Naturalization No. 35080262 is cancelled as of its date of issuance, 5/11/2012. Defendant is forever restrained and enjoined from claiming any rights or privileges, ben efits, or advantages relating to United States citizenship that he obtained as a result of his 5/11/2012 naturalization. Defendant is ordered to surrender and deliver, within ten days of this order, his Certificate of Naturalization, No. 35080262, an d any copies thereof in his possession, as well as any other indicia of United States citizenship, including but not limited to U.S. passports and passport cards, voter registration cards, and other relevant documents, whether current or expired, to the Attorney General, or his representative, including counsel for the United States of America. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/3/2020. (ljb)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 3, 2020

Filing 45 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 44 order entered this day, judgment is entered in favor of the United States on its complaint and against Abdulla Nagi Naser Daifullah. Defendant's citizenship is revoked pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a). The order ad mitting Defendant to citizenship is revoked and set aside, and the Certificate of Naturalization No. 35080262 is cancelled as of its date of issuance, 5/11/2012. Defendant is forever restrained and enjoined from claiming any rights or privileges, ben efits, or advantages relating to United States citizenship that he obtained as a result of his 5/11/2012 naturalization. Defendant is ordered to surrender and deliver, within ten days of this order, his Certificate of Naturalization, No. 35080262, an d any copies thereof in his possession, as well as any other indicia of United States citizenship, including but not limited to U.S. passports and passport cards, voter registration cards, and other relevant documents, whether current or expired, to the Attorney General, or his representative, including counsel for the United States of America. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/3/2020. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Daifullah
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By:	Anthony D. Bianco
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Abdulla Nagi Naser Daifullah
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?