Goodman v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
| Jonathan Elliott Goodman |
| Arkansas Department of Corrections, Black Community Developers Inc and Does All persons, Department and Bureaus |
| 5:2018cv00284 |
| November 5, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 Goodman's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; and directing Goodman to, within 30 days of the date of this Order, pay the $400 filing fee in full, if he wishes to proceed with this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/18/2018. (kdr)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Elliott Goodman. (kdr) |
| Filing 3 RESPONSE re #2 Order, by Jonathan Elliott Goodman. (kdr) |
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS directing the Plaintiff to either pay the $400 filing fee or file an IFP motion, on or before 12/10/2018; and directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff an IFP application, along with a prison trust fund calculation sheet and certificate. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/8/2018. (kdr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jonathan Elliott Goodman. (ljb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.