Warner v. Rhodes et al
Plaintiff: Derrick Gerard Warner
Defendant: Mike Rhodes and Ronnie Smith
Case Number: 5:2019cv00072
Filed: February 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: D P Marshall
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2019 Filing 11 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Derrick Gerard Warner re #8 Order, #9 Judgment, #10 Appellate Filing Fee Notice. (fjg)
March 22, 2019 Filing 10 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak)
March 22, 2019 Filing 9 JUDGMENT: Warner's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/22/2019. (jak)
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER dismissing Warner's complaint without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/22/2019. (jak)
March 20, 2019 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Derrick Gerard Warner re #6 Order, IFP Application. (fjg)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Warner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Clerk to send Warner an in forma pauperis application with a copy of this Order; and directing Warner to submit the completed application and certified calculation sheet by 3/22/2019. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/22/2019. (kdr)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PLAINTIFFS. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/22/2019. (kdr)
February 15, 2019 Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from District of Arkansas Western; Case Number 5:19-cv-05033. Electronic file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
February 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division. Docket Sheet and case documents sent to receiving court. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann on February 15, 2019. (lgd) [Transferred from arwd on 2/15/2019.]
February 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Derrick Gerard Warner. Motions referred to Mark E. Ford.(lgd) [Transferred from arwd on 2/15/2019.]
February 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Mike Rhodes, Ronnie Smith, filed by Derrick Gerard Warner.(lgd) [Transferred from arwd on 2/15/2019.]
February 15, 2019 Docket Note: IFP #2 Motion received and filed under seal in Little Rock vault pursuant to #3 Order. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warner v. Rhodes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrick Gerard Warner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Rhodes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronnie Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?