Reed v. Gober et al
Plaintiff: Cortez Reed
Defendant: Doe, Brian Slaughter, Sewzan Pots and Mark Gober
Case Number: 5:2019cv00135
Filed: April 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: D P Marshall
Referring Judge: J Thomas Ray
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE to the Court by Cortez Reed. (kdr)
May 24, 2019 Filing 10 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Cortez Reed re #7 Motion for Status, #8 Notice. Resent to updated address. (fjg)
May 22, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Cortez Reed. (kdr)
May 15, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE filed by Cortez Reed. (ljb)
May 15, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION for Status by Cortez Reed. (llg)
May 9, 2019 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Cortez Reed. (ljb)
May 9, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Cortez Reed. (jak)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to mail Reed a 1983 complaint form that is labeled "Amended Complaint;" and directing Reed to file, within 30 days of the date of this Order, an Amended Complaint that complies with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 4/24/2019. (kdr)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing plaintiff's custodian to collect monthly payments equal to 20% of the preceding month's income each time the amount in that account is greater than $10.00. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 4/24/19. (tjb)
April 11, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Cortez Reed. (llg)
April 11, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cortez Reed. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reed v. Gober et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Slaughter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sewzan Pots
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Gober
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cortez Reed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?