McAlphin v. Bland et al
James McAlphin |
Correct Care Solutions and Estella Bland |
5:2019cv00189 |
June 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Beth Deere |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 OBJECTIONS to #9 Recommended Disposition by James McAlphin. (llg) |
|
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Case by James McAlphin. (ljb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Reconsideration of #6 Order by James McAlphin. (llg) |
|
Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration and Objection re #4 Order by James McAlphin. (kdr) |
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS" as marked on the document.(jak) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office (wrong image file). The correct document was added to docket entry #2 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by James McAlphin.(kdr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2019: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James McAlphin. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.